2 random thoughts about 5e, and 1 about diverse systems

This is not a system discussion.

I expect no RPG system has ever been as thoroughly debated, described, praised or damned, analyzed and explained as this one. Dungeons & Dragons Fifth Edition is the 600 pound gorilla in the RPG store, the most-played of all systems, the most visible of all systems, and it has many, many people who know it infinitely better than I, so I will leave the in-depth analysis to those.

Instead, I will just offer two quick personal thoughts about differences between 5e and older Dungeons & Dragons versions, or even other Fantasy RPGs in general.

No.1: Magic.

DnD 5e is obviously a “high magic” system, but magic is still claimed to be “rare” in most sources, and random villagers are claimed to be “afraid” and “distrustful” of magic-users or non-humans. This makes very little sense, as magic permeates every fibre of every implied or published setting. It is front and center in the rules. It takes a lot of effort to make a character with no magical ability, and you can’t throw a stone without hitting a magic user.

There is an avalanche of non-humans milling around in every wood, cave, or small town. The idea of frightened, xenophobic, dumb villagers is a very Coastal-American one. They think of the central and mountain states (“Flyover-America”), which they know only from TV, and imagine a bunch of morons who don’t know how Uber works and who still use Windows 95.

But the truth is, if something is sufficiently common — like magic in 5e — it is as normal as cars or electricity.

The inhabitants of South Dakota may not be the biggest Uber-customers, but they have smartphones and they drive cars. They may not call an Uber the first minute they visit Seattle, but they will not run away screaming if they see one, and they will not holler insults and throw rotten apples at it either.

Why is magic so common: It is because every class has access to it, there are lots of Cantrips, lots of magical items, and lots of temples with priests who also work magic. You do not deny the existence of gods if one of them has killed your cousin and another one had his paladins heal the village when everyone was sick from cursed water. And you don’t freak out about magic if your nephew goes to wizard school and your neighbour has brought home a magical sickle from travelling, your innkeeper is a retired dungeon-delver and especially not if there is an adventurer group made up of dragonborn, elves, tieflings and gnomes passing through every second Tuesday.

Rules wise, DnD 5e spells are very thoroughly described and have precise durations, ranges, and damage effects. They are so detailed there is almost no mystery left, they are basically technology, quickly accumulated with level-gains.

Older editions had no cantrips, and magic users had to transcribe spells for weeks before they could use them. Magical loot was no flat sword +2, it was maybe a sword that could communicate with its wielder and tell him about secret doors and traps, and sometimes lied.

Such magicks are weird and strange, and it makes sense that Apple-Pete from Shallow Cove is a bit reserved when he meets a magic-user. Also, in 5e four out of five adventurers are non-humans, so you get used to armed half-orcs saving people and slaying monsters. In 5e, orcs are to humans what Quebecois are to people from Oregon: They talk weird and eat strange stuff, but are otherwise just the guys next door.

In older editions, the landscape was much more hostile and deadly. An orc lair had 30 to 300 orcs and to party of 4 with 6 retainers they were dangerous as hell, if they were not lucky and met 20 to 200 elves in the area. If you were low level — and you leveled considerably slower than in 5e, one or two arrows would end you. So it was wise to take cover if you saw an orc. Those who decided not to judge prematurely didn’t come home to tell the tale.

This brings us to…

No.2: Death

5e is said, and often derisively, to be extremely non-lethal. I do not think that is true, per se.

What IS true is that you reach level 2 after one or at the latest after two sessions. Everyone has dozens of hit points (even the monsters) and fights take a good long time whittling away HP, not unlike cutting down an old oak. Very rare is the sudden hit that takes you to zero and below. Once a player falls, he has three death saves, with a 55% chance of success each. If he makes them, he recovers. There are First-Level-Spells that stabilize you at once. Clerics have spells and cantrips at Level 1. And if a guy who barely made his death saves, all alone in a dirty cave, sleeps for six hours, he is as fit as he was when he woke up in a comfortable bedroom in an expensive Inn, long before his near-death-experience.

There are many arguments about that, with both sides pretty entrenched. “HP do not represent health, just a mix of blah blah!!!1!11!!” is one common one. “You are precious coddled little snowflakes blah blah!!!1!!11!!!” is another one.

But in the end it comes down to how the GM or DM handles the situation. You *can* calculate “CR” to make sure your party will be *just* strong enough to win the encounter with some scratches that are overcome with a short rest on a bench. But you can also just populate your dungeon and let the critters play smart, use ambush tactics, employ traps, take cover, call in reinforcements, protect their casters, and be just as tactical as the players are — focusing all attacks on one guy first, then on the second after that, play to the NPCs’ advantages, use weather, encumbrance, difficult terrain, and bring in the rules for exhaustion levels*, etc — and you will see PCs go down too.

Slower, yes. But they will fall nonetheless.

Room for different games

All things considered, the main difference between ODnD, B/X, and 5e, is flavour.

ODnD is a world of unknowns, where a player character lives in a largely undefined world, and every conflict can be over very quickly and go either way. 1d6 HP per level and 1d6 damage with any weapon, these factors make life and death rather hard to predict. Just like the spells, which are comparatively vague in their description. Just like the foes, who each have half a paragraph to describe them loosely, and that is it.

5e has a ton of rules and a player who studies them with great intent has a very good chance to calculate his or her odds in any situation. There are feats and items that give great details about what they can and cannot do. Spells are defined well, and monsters have stat blocks with exact WIS and CON values that give a clear picture about their strengths and weaknesses.

B/X falls somewhere in the middle between these poles, with more detailed descriptions and, in 99% of games, with variable weapon damage, but also with d8 monster HDs and relatively short paragraphs about monsters; but with more comprehensive stat blocks than in earlier games.

They are different games, for different tastes … or maybe even only for different moods that can make one player enjoy 5e on Tuesday and ODnD on Thursday.

There is an RPG scene outside of D&D, as you know

The hobby is big enough to have room for all three of those styles, and for many more. There are, outside of D&D, storygames, and GMless games, diceless games, and dice-pool-mechanics. There is cinematic play with superheroes or Wu-Xia action, there is deep character development, and class-less GURPS that does all of those, and there are percentile mechanics, and even “powered by the Apocalypse”, which I personally do not love, but which I see described very favourably by fans.

The RPG scene used to be an outsider scene for weirdos, until White Wolf came along and opened it up for the myriads of black-trenchcoaty teens with nose piercings and those who wanted to be like that. “World of Darkness” broke down the barrier between nerd-dom and cool cats, and it is therefore the pioneer that made the mad mainstream success of 5e possible.

There is room for different games, different tables, and different playstyles, and that is as it should be. Variety in games systems ensures that more people find a system (or more than one) that speaks to them and that they enjoy playing.

EDIT:
Interestingly, random thoughts can really move people, and stir up emotions. This is a reaction to the above post. 🙂

I am now considering if I should put that in the about-section of this blog. “Revisionist horseshit”. It has a certain je ne sais quoi.

.

Image: 5e Dungeon Master’s Guide, cover photo; Illustrator being one Tyler Jacobson.

.

.

* Seriously, look at those rules about exhaustion levels. They are much neglected.

3 thoughts on “2 random thoughts about 5e, and 1 about diverse systems

  1. “Magical loot was no flat sword +2, it was maybe a sword that could communicate with its wielder and tell him about secret doors and traps, and sometimes lied.”

    I had to check to make sure you were actually referring to AD&D and its like. Which did have, as every edition did, intelligent swords but they are hardly the standard, the treasure tables and modules are full of banal +2 swords as anyone who played that edition can tell you.

    The 5e DMG has an entire section bout creating the distinct and intelligent magic items with a history and flavour.

    I wouldn’t agree that 5e has ‘tons of rules for everything.’ Most spells and magic items are described in a few short paragraphs. Feats are optional. This is exactly why so many 3e and 4e fans dislike it.

    I’d also disagree that “The RPG scene used to be an outsider scene for weirdos…” When I was a kid in the 80s there was a large and popular D&D club in elementary and junior high, boys and girls were part of it. Several of my older brothers also played it and they weren’t nerds. It fell out of favour for a few years in high school and was briefly considered nerdy or more often childish but then came roaring back in the first years of uni. This myth of D&D being something only for isolated nerds is only briefly true in the history of the game and certainly not true during its early 80s peak or the 90s.

    Like

    1. Thanks for taking the time to comment on my random thoughts.

      You have a point about the swords, there are loads of “+X”-swords in all systems.
      About 5e rules, on the one hand, yes, nearly every rule mentions in some way that it is optional, but if you have any number of 5e players you will quickly hurt feelings if you disregard page 165 section 2 of Tasha’s Cauldron (don’t bother looking up what that is, I just made said a random page number), because you can be sure that someone knows that particular part of the rules in and out and it is integral to his gaming experience. Feats, especially … I invite you to try and start a 5e game without feats. You will be sure to have long debates about that decision, long before any dice come out of the bags.
      There are six or ten thick hardcover books, and the typical 5e aficionado has bought them twice, one time on paper and one time on DnD Beyond, and can quote the rules back at you, and will correct you if you make a mistake.
      The same is true for ADnD 1e, of course.
      In many ways, 5e is ADnD 5e, and the real distinction is not between 1e and 5e but between Basic and Advanced.

      D&D being something for isolated nerds is a very true thing, I have personally lived through this in the early 1990ies, and it was a distinct niche in the local game stores – a special community that was visibly different from “normal” games. But I believe you that it can vary from one locale to another, and while in city A roleplaying was an odd basement thing for “losers” or “freaks” wearing black trenchcoats, it can very well have been an accepted and well-supported school activity in city B.
      My personal impression was that Mark Rein-Hagen’s “Vampire, the Masquerade” was what brought the hobby into the open, because it tied in nicely with the books of Anne Rice and particularly their successful film adaptions (Interview with a Vampire, 1994), and thus had good mass appeal — but that is just anecdotal and can be wrong, maybe it coincided with a growing acceptance of roleplaying games on a larger scale during the 1990ies that would have happened with or without Vampires.

      Like

  2. As to whether being a roleplayed (not just D&D) was a weird / outsider thing in the 80s, I’d have to agree, based on my experience anyway. Obviously it was different in various places, and to different degrees, but I remember there being clubs and such that were accepted in schools and such – to the extent that they existed and were supported. But gen pop? Nope – they thought it was strange. They thought wargamers were strange, and roleplayers were even worse. At least (IMO) until the mid to late 90s, in my experience, here in Australia. I also know others of my friends had different experiences.

    As to 5e and lethality? I’ve only played about a dozen sessions of 5e, with some old school friends of mine. It was harder to die, but not impossible. Mostly what I see from blog posts and responses is a completely different culture of play and expectation. Probably why I’ve mostly played non D&D since the 90s. Mostly Traveller, Amber, Over the Edge, Runequest 2, Call of Cthulhu (but not generally running mythos stuff), Flashing Blades, GURPS. Now looking at Into the Odd and Mothership, and re-visiting Call of Cthulhu.

    Like

Leave a Reply to ahabicher Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s